When questioned by reporters for more details, Warnock declines to engage on whether he’d consider any abortion limits as part of reestablishing a national right.Īsked last week whether he’d support a federal bill codifying the previous Supreme Court standard - essentially allowing most elective abortions up to the point a fetus is viable, with states able to place some regulations even before then - Warnock said, “I think that we’ve got to explore all options to protect this core constitutional principle.” Warnock, for his part, told voters as recently as Monday night that he has both “a profound reverence for life” and “an abiding respect for choice,” declaring the government does not belong in a patient’s room. Abortion rights group, meanwhile, are reticent to back any limits on abortion access, including later in pregnancy. The most conservative anti-abortion groups want a national ban, with some going so far as to oppose even exceptions in cases involving rape, incest or health risks to a pregnant woman. Democrats, meanwhile, could oppose such Republican efforts as draconian.Īll sides knew it it would be the Supreme Court, not them, making any ultimate decision.īut with the high court in June overturning the 1973 decision legalizing abortion nationwide, the issue has become one of the animating variables of the 2022 midterm campaigns. And it underscores the sometimes-delicate task that confronts other candidates from both major parties who hope to use the issue ahead of the midterm elections.įor decades under Roe, Republicans like Walker were able to call themselves “pro-life” and blast “abortion on demand,” perhaps even expressing support for absolute or near-total bans that federal courts were certain to strike down. She provided a receipt indicating she had paid $575 for an abortion, as well as a get-well card from Walker and bank deposit records showing the image of a $700 personal check from Walker dated five days after the abortion receipt.Īt the least, the report complicates Walker’s effort to use abortion as an issue against Warnock. The Daily Beast interviewed a woman who identified herself as a former girlfriend of Walker’s and asked that her name not be disclosed out of concerns for her privacy. The contest is one of the most consequential in the country this midterm season and could determine which party controls the Senate for the second half of President Joe Biden’s first term in office.Ībortion is an issue in other Senate races as well, including Colorado, Florida and North Carolina. The story propelled the issue of abortion back to the center of the race in the closing weeks of the campaign - and just ahead of the candidates’ Oct. Wade America, where the procedure is open to regulation by state governments and, potentially, by Congress.īut Walker’s strategy may not work much longer after The Daily Beast reported Monday that the former University of Georgia and NFL football star encouraged and paid for a girlfriend’s abortion in 2009 - a blatant contradiction of his staunch claims that there’s “no excuse” for a procedure he characterizes as “killing.” Walker calls the report a “flat-out lie.” The sidestepping by Warnock, who supports abortion rights, and Walker, who has called for a national ban, reflects the sensitivity of abortion politics in a post-Roe v. Raphael Warnock and his Republican challenger, Herschel Walker, have each been laboring to cast the other as an extremist on abortion while deflecting questions about the finer points of their own positions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |